Common Mistakes in Engineering Change Management and How to Avoid Them

Engineering Change Management

Engineering Change Management (ECM) is an integral process of any engineering-oriented enterprise. It helps execute changes related to product updates, design alterations or quality enhancements with minimum disruption. That said, ECM is a complicated process with many moving pieces — making it very easy to miss key information. ECM mistakes translate to slack time delays, costs and lower quality of the product. 

Here, in this blog we will be covering some common Engineering Change Management mistakes and how Organizations can avoid them for an efficient as well as smooth change management process. 

Lack of Clear Documentation and Traceability

Low documentation and traceability is one of the most fundamental problems in ECM. Changes made or proposed without adequate records can make it hard to know why a change was made, who signed off on the change, or how it affects other components of the product. Lack of documentation can create confusion, and sometimes even going back and doing the same step twice, just to better understand how it might affect some previous changes made by one of the team members. 

How to Avoid It: 

The lack of documentation and traceability is one of the most basic issues in ECM. Regardless, changes made to or proposed without sufficient records can create a challenge when it comes time to know why a change existed in the first place, who approved said change, or its impact on other product components. That was the time I started feeling that there is no documentation at all, which creates confusion, and going back to repeat a step twice just to gain an understanding of how this might affect some earlier changes done by one of the team members. 

Insufficient Stakeholder Involvement

In ECM, all stake-holders needs to be involved from design engineers to production staff and quality control. If the stakeholders are not involved in the process, they may not have an idea about the change and then priorities can tangled while moving ahead which sometimes leads to interruption in your production process. 

How to Avoid It: 

Involve any and all stakeholders as soon as possible in the process, making sure they impact the approval of modifications. Conducting periodic meetings and open discussions can help alleviate any issues or recommendations. PLM system have access of multiple tools which are collaborative and helps to improve the communication in transparency. 

Ignoring Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

Effective communication is vital to ECM success. If communication channels are weak, information about the change may not be communicated to all departments in time leading to mistakes, delays or duplication of work. Let’s say a design change has been approved but the production team is not aware of it yet — the result could be that they go on producing an old version of the product. 

How to Avoid It: 

Define a well communication protocol, ensure all stakeholders are notified in time when a change has been proposed, approved or implemented Notification and updates in a PLM system help provide the latest information to team members. To further organize the team, holding regular meetings to talk about what changes are on the way might help. 

Inadequate Testing of Proposed Changes

Engineering changes are often made to provide one of the following improvements: enhanced performance, quality or efficiency. But untested changes may risk introducing unpredictable issues. One of the common blunders made is to skip or rush through testing phases which subsequently lead to compromised product quality and costly recalls. 

How to Avoid It: 

For every change, use a standard test protocol. Perform functional and integration tests to confirm that the change works as expected. Also, ensure that it does not impact other existing systems negatively. So, it can accelerate here using digital testing tools and simulated tests — able to verify the changes first before they enter into full production. 

Failure to Document Lessons Learned

Failures or unintended consequences from changes create valuable lessons. But a lot of orgs skip actually writing this stuff down, and then make the same mistakes again later. 

How to Avoid It: 

Create a ‘lessons learned’ process for every major engineering change Make notes for challenges faced and how they were overcame and what will be the better way. Periodic review of this documentation with the ECM team may prevent such fallacies from occurring again and reduce repeat occurrences in the future. 

Overlooking Regulatory and Compliance Requirements

The rules governing numerous enterprises are precise. This typically governs changes in design, materials or production processes. Not considering these requirements can result in compliance violations, monetary penalties or delays bringing products to market. 

How to Avoid It: 

Embed compliance checks in the ECM process to ensure that all changes are compliant with regulations. Employ a PLM solution that allows compliance tracking and can also track if any updates in the process should call for additional approvals or testing. Bringing in the regulatory affairs team to review is another way to ensure compliance with standards. 

Neglecting Training for Team Members

If there are changes in processes, tools, or designs that a team need to take part of, it might entail teaching the new skills to perform them. Not having adequate training would result in mistakes, inefficiencies — and worse yet if employees don’t know new requirements. 

How to Avoid It: 

When introducing a big change, you may provide training sessions as well. This may also include training on new tools or software, even methodologies if needed. Integrating all your learning tools with a PLM system with an embedded learning module can facilitate your workforce to stay in sync with the changing processes and updates. 

Lack of Accountability and Ownership

Without a strong accountability mechanism, changes can slip through the cracks resulting in only partial or delayed implementation. Ambiguity around responsibility means limited accountability, which equates to a less motivation and follow-through. 

How to Avoid It: 

Delegated ownership by change with project management tools for tracking. By clarifying who is responsible for each step in the ECM journey, this helps ensure that everything is done on schedule and to standard. A PLM system can be used to assign roles and monitor progress on information that is falling by the wayside. 

Conclusion:

Engineering Change Management is critical in product quality and has a vital role for continuous improvement process elements in engineering focused industries. But common pitfalls during the process can stifle efficiency, inflate costs, and detrimentally affect product quality. Recognising and mitigating these issues enables organisations to develop a solid ECM process that faces minimal disruption and supports a culture of ongoing improvement. 

A PLM system that seamlessly includes ECM functions can facilitate the complete change management process from documentation->testing->stakeholder communication to compliance checks. By using the correct strategic planning and adapting to bring refinements, organizations can make ECM a natural, efficient, and value-adding part of overall activity that enhances product quality and operational efficiency 

Engineering Change Management (ECM) is a structured process for managing modifications in engineering designs, products, or systems. It ensures changes are documented, evaluated, and implemented effectively to maintain product quality, compliance, and project timelines.

A Change Management Engineer oversees and coordinates changes in engineering designs or processes, ensuring they meet quality and compliance standards. They evaluate impacts, update documentation, collaborate across teams, and help implement changes efficiently while minimizing disruptions.

An Engineering Change Request (ECR) initiates the process, proposing a potential change and its rationale. An Engineering Change Notice (ECN) follows approval, formally authorizing and detailing the approved change for implementation, ensuring documentation and communication across teams.

An Engineering Change Request (ECR) initiates the process, proposing a potential change and its rationale. An Engineering Change Notice (ECN) follows approval, formally authorizing and detailing the approved change for implementation, ensuring documentation and communication across teams.

Follow Milestone PLM Solutions for Mechanical Industry Updates, CAD Tips and Global Mechanical News.  

Milestone PLM Solutions with its exclusive delivery center in India is a global CAD, CAM & FEA services outsourcing partner serving the needs of the Mechanical, Millwork and Automotive industry since 2004. MILESTONE focuses on the unique needs of clients and believes in tackling real-life problems with efficiency, smooth and ease. 

The MILESTONE team can assist you with Product Design, 3d Modeling, Drafting & detailing, Reverse Engineering, FEA Analysis and more. We support multiple software including AutoCAD, SolidWorks, Catia, NX, Inventor, Solidedge & Ansys etc. Our approach is to provide a dedicated team for each customer over ongoing project and deliver the quality output consistently. 

With our state of art technology and large talent pool of Engineers, we are developing best in class solutions for our customers across the globe. We align with your culture and values to form unbreakable partnerships and are primed for success with over 100 employees and 150 customers in the US, Europe, India, and Asia. 

You can email us at info@milestonetech.net and can log in to our website www. milestonetech.net  to know more about our services and our work portfolio or contact us on  +1-844-598-0005

How can we help you?

Contact us or submit a business inquiry online.

MIT